The Clapsadle Carcass: New Pictures Exposed.

This is a exclusive.

It’s been a few weeks since the “Clapsadle Carcass” emerged on the beach in New London, CT. Upon discovery by the Clapsadle family, very little has been discussed as to where the beast is or who is performing the research on it. It seems apparent that these monsters are real and being handled accordingly by authorities.

I was able to get my hands on some rare pictures of the “Clapsadle Carcass”. This beast looks much different from the original Montauk Monster pictures that were discovered earlier this summer. Loren Coleman of has appropriately named the bloated carcass. (Alliteration baby!) Seriously, what a great name for it?

An active member of member (sausage1) felt the same:

“I love this story for two reasons. First, we have explanations ranging from sheep to raccoon, from big cat to various sea mammals, which must say something about pinning an animal ID down when the circumstances are just slightly out of the ordinary. Second, the name “Clapsadle”. What a great name! The next time someone sees a badly coiffured mendicant after a night on the pop and says ‘I tell ya it was bigfoot!’ you can say ‘aw, Bob, have a day off, will ya, stop clapsadlin”

If you have more information on the Clapsadle Carcass please e-mail:

What could this bloated creature be?
Clapsadle Carcass

Clapsadle Carcass

Clapsadle Carcass

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

92 Responses to “The Clapsadle Carcass: New Pictures Exposed.”

  1. Kevin says:

    I’d say it depends on size….. Either a sheep carcass or far more likely the remains of a rotting polar bear cub. The polar bear cub would make more sense.

  2. Helen says:

    May be totally out in left field here, but looking at the first picture/monster, the name Chupacabra (spelling) of Texas/ Mexico legend comes to mind. There was a program on one of the networks, and one lady rancher also had a carcass to show….weird looking thing. The second, more recent one appears more like a water logged sheep than anything.

  3. Roscoe says:

    Look at a young polar bears carcass……it has all the earmarks of a young polar bear.the ice is getting to be a problem,and there are reports of polarbears being stuck on icefloes until they either starve to death…or they drown trying to make it to shore ……look at the skull specifically ahead of the eye socket and the layout of the teeth and jaw structure…too close to be mere luck.the mottled “fur” also looks the same as if you have a wetpolar bear hide.,,,,grew up in the arctic,not so strange a sight if you have been there and seen results of a hunt.

  4. Alleigh says:

    srry. typo dead pig that bloated.

  5. Alleigh says:

    It also kinda looks like a canine skull. Like a gray wolf. The body looks like a dead pic that bloated. and like a sheep wool or something. I’d suspect Plum Island. But maybe this one was released a while ago then live some where else and plunged to it’s ultamete doom.

  6. Alleigh says:

    That is like really really fat for a skull that small. The skull and teeth also have a discolored look to them. I don’t think it’s a hoax or a sheep. I just don’t think that it washed up in one piece.

  7. HasItBeen4YearsYet? says:


  8. kristine says:

    it looks like a sheep!

  9. etan says:

    “looks like chicken smells like dead dog, must be time to shower…”

    -old chinese pobverb-

  10. James says:

    If you look at how the incisors, canines and premolars are positioned then its clear that this is a canine of some type. I had originally thought this might be a pit bull (internet search of “dog skull” brings up several examples). But as an earlier anonymous entry suggests it looks very much like a wolf skull. As Steven Alamond pointed out this specimen has a snout that runs right up to the forehead with little or no dip. A grey wolf’s snout has this very same charactoristic. Check out the link below and compare the arrangement of a wolf’s teeth with the “monster’s”.


  11. cegee says:

    Ok..does anyone see that lump of skin\fat located on the right side of the neck in image #1?? Look closely I see a resemblance of a nose and mouth. It appears if that skin was stretched over to the skull it would cover and make the face of the so called creature…I see it..anyone else????

  12. Mike says:

    That is not a racoon. R u dumb!

  13. Steven Alamond says:

    Although it seems reasonable, I don’t think its a dog… at least not the type of dog anyone has listed yet. My reasoning behind this is because of the snout, and the arch that gaps the forehead to the nose.

    In all the pictures of skulls (save one, that looks to be the skull of a puppy) there is a very prominent dip, while the skull itself is narrower, and the snout longer.

    If you look at the ‘monster’s’ skull, the snout is wider, and runs into the forehead in a straight line, without dipping. I know there are breeds of dogs with this characteristic also, but they also sport long snouts, which the creature does not have.

    The tooth patterns are similar to what one would expect a dog would have, (at least as far as they are visible… I can’t tell if the rear teeth are molars) but it is obvious the animal is carnivorous.

    That excludes sheep, which was my first guess (probably because of the bloated body shape)

  14. joel says:

    I saw one of these “things” washed up along the Delaware River in PA, while I was mountain biking with 3 others on 5/10/09. We thought nothing of it, wondering if it was a pig, skinned racoon, or turtle without its shell. It smelled so bad that we had to leave. One of us almost lost our lunch. It was belly up and dry. The skin was very tuff and rigid, similar to a deflated basketball. I know this because i poked it with a stick.
    It’s funny how 4 days later poeple are claiming it is a monster. I’m sorry but we didn’t come up with a clever name for ours, nor did we bring it home in a trashbag and put it on ice.
    I will gladly tell you where it is. Mybe it is still there. I personally have no interest in it.

  15. Gillianne says:

    Looks like a goat to me.

  16. Some other person says:

    To anyone that says this is a sheep, I’m sorry to let you down, but sheep do not have front teeth on the top, like this carcass does. Like most ruminants, they only have front teeth on the bottom. Look at a sheep skull (or a real sheep) if you don’t believe me.

    Bringing this point further, this carcass has obvious canine teeth, which means that it is carnivorous, or at the very least omnivorous. In layman’s terms… this thing is NOT a plant-eater.

    If you ask me, it most closely resembles a dog, bloated from death and the water. But I’m not placing any bets because this is only three small pictures, all taken at a similar angle, and frankly I can’t see it all well enough to say anything definite. I’d like a better picture of the back end. I can’t even see if it has a tail, or if that’s just some more sea debris surrounding it.

    How mysteriously inconvenient!

  17. Brian says:

    You are ALL incorrect. This is not a dog, seal, otter, deer or any combination of two. This is clearly a baby polar bear that washed up from the LOST island.

  18. Dia says:

    a hungarian sheperd to be correct. Look on google

  19. Dia says:

    … it’s definitely some kind of a shepherd dog I think. And please people, be serious, since when do seals have a dog’s tail?

  20. Dia says:

    I’m sorry guys, but in fact for me this looks like a huge dog. See the google link to compare the skull ;)

  21. Somebody taste it and see if it tastes like chicken.

  22. Fabi says:

    and if not that then surely it’s a prank or a sick joke in which probably animals (head doesn’t seem to belong to the body) have suffered….
    unless it’s made out of silicones and stuff…..

  23. Fabi says:

    This is an animal mutilated beyond proper recognition. I think we ought to focus more on who or what did this to this animal.

    The mere fact of being in the water won’t scalp an animal nor have it’s head decompose faster than it’s body. Both this “monster” and previous one seem to have been mutilated.

    I think we’re looking at Animal Abuse at it’s worst….

  24. M Russell says:

    Can’t help but notice the similarity in appearance the the Chupacabra (sp) found lurking alive and well in Texas!

  25. Ampprod says:


  26. Radu says:

    One more thing. The pictures above and the video from “the night of discovery” don’t add up. In the video there was no bottom jaw or teeth yet in the pictures they are all there. Where did you get them from?

  27. Radu says:

    Good one, the skull obviously does not go with the body. I dont think the body is a seal because the front legs are to long but could be about anything. The head is from a canine in a completely different state of decomposition. They could of been found in the same area and put together as a conversation peice. A good photographer would of taken some pics of the feet as they would give a good indication of what the body belongs to. Kind of looks like a small bear.

  28. tanny says:

    there is no montauk monster. its a dog. both of them. the first one was a Boxer the second one is a bulldog

  29. K Ward says:

    It does look very much like a sheep, and anything floating in the water would bloat and look very different than normal. But what really doesn’t make sense about this to me, is that the head is a cleaned skull, and yet the torso is still covered with flesh or meat of some kind. If it had been dead long enough for the head to be a skull, the rest of the bones would also be skeletal remains. OR if some scavenger animal(s) had cleaned the meat off the skull, why did they leave the rest of the body untouched? – Doesn’t add up!

  30. Mike says:

    Ha wow you said the first one was stolen and than turned to “goo.” So your gonna lock this one up in a cooler so no real scientist can examine it again? Ha I bet this one will turn into “goo ice.” Get a real hobby try fishing, instead of making creatures with different animals parts you freak!

  31. ;; says:

    Don’t come to Korea…..It’s terrible….

  32. liknmylife says:

    ———These are bloated, and decomposing dog carcasses.————
    And you’re not gonna get bird flu, pig flu, or lyme disease from them.

  33. D Reynolds says:

    Wonder if it is that prize-winning dog that ran away from the airport crate several years ago and was never found.

  34. BKC says:

    It is a dog skull shoved into a seal carcass.

  35. Klebster says:

    It looks like a polar bear killed by all our “global warming” HAHAHA

  36. Jyn Meyer says:

    Take a look at that skull. Know what that is? It’s an otter skull!

    The thing looks large for an otter- but bloated things get bigger, and they become colorful…they lose their hair in chunks, and parts of them decompose off.

    I still think the MM can definitely be an otter.
    I have some videos on my theory on my youtube channel above. Thanks for sharing!!

  37. cooly1245 says:

    look like a rat

  38. Ted says:

    If you google (animal type) + “skull” in an image search, it becomes apparent this cannot be a sheep, goat, pig, cat, bear, elk, deer, horse or any other indigenous animal except for a dog. The configuration of the skull, jaw and teeth makes this OBVIOUSLY a dog. The only challenge is matching the shape of the snout to a particular breed’s skull and Viola! You have your beast.

    The new one that washed up? No way to have a clue until a DNA and/or skull match are done… but everything looks funky when it washes onshore after dying and sopping up seawater, aside from being nibbled by fish or whatever.

  39. Anonymous says:

    It’s a gray wolf. Here’s a link to a picture of the skull. (Click name) (NOT PORN/A TRICK)

  40. TONY says:

    this is obviously not the same thing as the montauk monster..i do agree with the science teacher above where i’m typeing now about this perticular pic being a dead seal and the skull of another animal..and to be honest i think it’s a cover up…thats not the same thing as what was found in montauk…i mean where’d the beak go..the toes don’t even look the same..yea things rot but not so much so that it’s that degraded..esp in salt water..things do rot..but not half as fast as in fresh water..the salt is a preservitive there for it would still be in pretty good condition unless they waited forever and a day to take this pic…yea…it’s gotta be some thing to throw off the public..i mean really would you want people to know that a possable griffin,or true to life gargoyle really i wouldn’t either…but ya know it would be kinda cool…i believe in the supernatural…and how could any one that would believe in a god that could turn water into wine not beileve in some thing eles supernatural…i mean really now…in short you don’t have to be a science teacher or have a degree to know thats not the same thing…sorry…you could’ve had me if i were slow…lol..but thats just not the reality of it all now is…

  41. science teacher says:

    Being a science teacher here’s what that animal is…it’s the rotting body of SEAL with the skull of deer (or dog) placed inside the seal body. If you look close enough you can even see how they tried to “cover” the open gaps between the rotting seal body and the unnattatched skull with chunks of seaweed. This is just the AWFUL sham job of some bored teenagers who live by the sea and wanted to stir some people up.

  42. Nicky Papers says:


    Not sure if this is a seal. If it is, it appears to have some deformities. Why is the body so compressed? What happened to it’s face? It is possible that another animal may have ate away at the face, but it appears very bloated to me. This may not be the same “species” at the Montauk Monster by this distance in CT is located closer to Plum Island. I would have to say that the likelyhood of this being a linked to Plum Island is greater than the Montauk Monster as it would have had to swim around (or float) around the forks of Long Island.

  43. megan says:

    OK! clearly, it is a SEAL! seals have sharp canine teeth like that because they hunt fish and penguins (meat–carnivorous), the front limbs of the body have long apendages, fingerlike, which are the bones inside a seal’s front flippers, its obviously covered in slightly furry but mostly sleek-looking seal skin, it has tons of blubber or fat to keep warm, it appears to have a small tail like a seal, and its skull is obviously one of a seal. i guess you could account for the shortness of its neck– maybe it died from some kind of neck injury that broke the neck and pushed it more towards its body, making it look like it has a freakishly short neck. anyways, IT IS A SEAL. get over it! :)

  44. Trixy says:

    That isn’t the same creature!!! Have you seen the original pictures?
    This looks stupid and nothing like the first pictures released. The maker of these pictures did a horrible job and should be ashamed of their self.

  45. Lago says:

    It is just another raccoon like the Montauk Monster was. (Not guessing here)

  46. AngelD says:

    When did sheep start growing canines??

  47. just lookin says:

    p.s. Sheep can’t swim, as you can tell by its positioning. It didn’t stand a chance at sea.

  48. just lookin says:

    This is obviously the washed up carcass of a sheep.
    You can still see the lambswool and the whole structure
    of the animal and its skull is consistent.


  49. dawn says:

    looks like a sheep

  50. Shawn says:

    Looks like someone shoved a dog skull into a raccoon carcass or something.

Leave a Reply About The Montauk Monster