BREAKING NEWS: Montauk Monster found at Gurney’s Inn


Bookmark and Share

Just in time for 4th of July weekend, the Montauk Monster has made its return to the shores of Long Island washing up at Gurney’s Inn. (Oceanside resort located in Montauk, NY) The initial discovery was made by PJ Monte and friends while walking on beach property owned by Gurney’s Inn. (July 2nd 2009 at 6:15 PM) The dead and bloated carcass washed up during an elegant oceanfront wedding. With gorgeous views of the Atlantic Ocean it’s no surprise that the Montauk Monster decided to crash the party!

As for the wedding party, the carcass went undetected as PJ Monte and friends moved it to a different location and the photography session began shortly after. Now you are probably wondering how once again I made it to the eye of the storm to cover the breaking news. Allow me to give you the play-by-play.

While on Facebook this evening, I saw an update on PJ Monte’s wall indicating that he found The Montauk Monster as he uploaded photographs to his Flickr account. Yours truly, (Nicky Papers!) is connected to PJ through mutual friends. (God bless social networking!) Within 10 minutes of PJ’s wall posting I was able to get in touch with him by phone and explained that I was interested in covering the story. PJ graciously accepted my wishes and invited me to come out Gurney’s to check it out for myself.

With excitement, I rallied out to Montauk to once again get an up-close-and-personal encounter with the Montauk Monster. Upon arrival at Gurney’s Inn, PJ introduced me to his friends and his father Paul Monte. (General Manager, Gurney’s Inn) Paul Monte led the way as I was taken to a remote part of the property to witness the beast again with my own eyes.

The monster was removed from an ice-filled enclosure and laid out for all to view. The stench this time was so horrific it triggered my gag reflex and I was forced to take a step back. PJ and the crew lifted their shirts over their noses for relief from the rotting stench.

Sure enough, we were all looking at a very similar creature that has now washed up for the fourth documented time by photograph. For those who’ve doubted my discoveries, (Geraldo Rivera, Doug Kennedy) please note that I was with company who have openly revealed themselves and are willing to discuss this incident further.

After the viewing session we loaded the carcass back into the ice-filled enclosure for safe keeping. PJ Monte had to make an early exit as he was on his way to a party that evening in the Hamptons. My discussions with Paul Monte continued with his assistant Kon in an office located on the premises. Paul Monte agreed to run the pictures taken earlier that evening by his son PJ Monte as a Montauk-Monster.com exclusive.

What’s most disturbing about this discovery is that PJ and Paul’s last name is Monte sharing the well-known nickname for the Montauk Monster, “Monty”. Is this a coincidence or possibly the coming of the apocalypse? In a private conversation with PJ Monte, I mentioned that I had a premonition that our paths would be crossing by the way of the Montauk Monster. Being that this was the first time we had met, I think he was slightly freaked out by that remark. Nonetheless, I had to get that off my chest.

Additionally, the couple who contacted me in May (Monster found in Southhold, NY) made claims that while the dead carcass was in their backyard, (in an ice-filled cooler) the wife had terrible nightmares. They still wish to remain anonymous as the husband disposed of the carcass on a boat ride to Block Island to put his wife at ease. In fear of public humiliation, they wish to keep their identity unknown.


I’m still convinced these creatures are washing up from Plum Island. What do you think?

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

55 Responses to “BREAKING NEWS: Montauk Monster found at Gurney’s Inn”

  1. Jayme says:

    Okay I have an idea about these things I have seen all the pictures and videos, 1st off these could be anything, second off everyone screaming about the size does anyone remember that when you die and are not found for a while you bloat up and you body can get to 3 to 4 times the size it was when you were alive? 2nd off, this thing was in water as well, if you remember being a kid and swimming during the summer your feet and hands get all shriveled, after longer periods of time you body if I recall correctly starts to suck up liquids, so, if this was indeed a land animal that was then put in the water death liquids and the water factor in for the LARGE size of these things. Also if anything take the skulls to an animal bio-chem type person at a college I don’t think they would charge anything if you say hey I’m a new student and was told to come to you with this, do you recognize this skull, or if anything take the pictures and or videos, take tissue samples too and prolly you would get an easier answer then going to some DNA place where you would get charged tons of money, they could use this “animal” for helping students identify animal remains. Give it a try, can’t hurt.

  2. alvaro says:

    It looks like a dead cow to me.
    Besides, the skull seems clean compared to the rest of its body. I guess it’s fake.

  3. Stephanie says:

    OMG you people are idiotic….IT’S NOT A GOAT. IT HAS TOES. And for the people saying it was a scientific experiement gone wrong, WHY THE HELL WOULD IT BE WASHING UP ON THE SHORE? PROFESSIONAL scientists are the only people accessable to those kinds of labs, and PROFESSIONAL scientists wouldn’t wash away their experiments….I’ll have to agree Dagan and Megan, though…

  4. Vaz says:

    Looks like a scietific experiment on animals gone wrong…..
    where the fuck is all the scientist?…

  5. alex says:

    think this is connected to the creature they found in panama???????

  6. Rubes says:

    The first one is a racoon. If you search on Google images Montaulk monster it comes up with an image compairing a racoon skull, A live racoon and some other things. I haven’t seen the second and I’m not sure what the third is. Maybe some sort of dog. Probablly a german shepard or even a small wolf.

  7. Lilly-Anne says:

    Folks, come on – all that monster tallking…sounds more like wishes for something interesting than reality. Ok, those bodies look disturbing, but do you even imagine what nature and rotting process can do to any remains after a few days? Especially when lying in water full of fish?
    The first “monster” disappeared – maybe because parts of it were faked.
    And the fact that no public or governmental institutions really pay attention to all of that… – maybe it is simply not important enough to care about. All that talking about Plum Island and a secret lab…sounds like a version of “Lost” or Hodgin’ s conspiracy theories in “Bones”. :)

  8. Axl says:

    i think it looks like a mutated cow,dog,and a raccon with a fossil beak i think somebody spilled a chemical in the ocean that MUTATED THE SEA CREATURE and some sea creature ate it and messed up there DNA.

  9. johny lubutowitz says:

    people…. for god sakes… get it together…..the picture posted here is a friggen dog. for christ sake. its a dead give away. but the previous picture is something to inquire about… the decaying corpse is very strange.. it does not resemble anything i have ever seen.. its sure as hell not a dog…. or a racoon it may be a turtle without its shell but its beak is to pointy… with teeth…. turtles do not have teeth…. and is it so had to believe ( for those shallow minded people) that there is somthing that we(the OH so superior) humans have not discoverd that is all!

  10. M-E-E says:

    my friends and i are also wondering why their isn’t any scientists on scene including the press, police, archeologists , and the public. tell you the truth if there isn’t as much publicity as i would of expected it could be a hoax.
    anybody who agrees e-mail me @ chuchi.boalick8@gmail.com thanks

    M-E-E
    (Michelle,Eveie,Erika)

  11. sami says:

    i think that the third one is a dog but the skull its strange like its plastic and the sekond is a pig but the first one is strange i think its not a racun because its to big and hi has a beak

  12. Dagan says:

    It would make sense that these are just deformed animals being washed ashore from Plum Island. Whether or not it is from disease or experimentation, they obviously resemble some distorted versions of certain animals. The fact that these are government related would also explain the lack of media coverage and local authority investigations.
    To be quite honest, its not all that mysterious haha There are regularly discoveries that baffle modern science and in many cases I wouldnt doubt that half of them are unnatural (from cause of human intervention).

    think about it… sloth without hair can occur from disease.
    Experimenting with DNA is a way of finding cures to many diseases so it would totally be understandable to see a buttload of weird looking creatures.

  13. Josh says:

    At first, I thought this was a German Shepherd, but looking at the skull of this thing, then a German Shepherd, both in profile, the face of this mystery corpse is more angular, even though the fur looks like a German Shepherd’s, and so does the rest of the body, albeit a tad bloated.

  14. kay says:

    thats a dog…..

  15. Nonna says:

    It looks like a wolf :S

  16. [...] (BREAKING NEWS: Montauk Monster found at Gurney’s Inn) [...]

  17. Brix from China says:

    this is very interesting. the world is full mystery.
    there are lots of animals that are waiting to be discovered. it might just be a new species or something. the one in Panama is more interesting coz it resembles like human. but others look like a cow. i will read more on this!

  18. Megan says:

    I looked up Plum Island and they seem to be big about preventing and finding out about animal disease, mostly for house pets and farm animals… Could they be dumping possible test subjects? http://www.ars.usda.gov/main/site_main.htm?modecode=19-40-00-00

    By the way Hendrik and anyone ELSE that thinks the first original Monster was a washed up sea turtle with out the shell is WRONG! Do some research, Turtles and tortoise’s shells are infused with their spines. If that was a turtle with out the shell you’d see a bunch of guts and innards.. not skin. Real turtles and tortoises have skin attached to their shell they can’t go in to their shell like the old cartoons show… look it up people.

  19. the first one actually did look like a monster or some unknown thing but this one looks like a dead husky or some dog of sort…like come on the fur,the paws … if you actually think this ones a monter this time they finally caught your eyes…cuz last time the second looked like a pig..this one looks like a dog…the first one to me is the only mystery here…like c’mon!!

  20. jules says:

    That is a dead dog. I work in a vet’s office and that last one looks very much like a dead dog, or some other smallish mammal. Yeah, pretty sure that it’s a dead dog

  21. Hendrik says:

    Hello,
    i saw the pictures and the videos from that ” monster ” who was found at the beach.

    I´m sorry for must to say that, but your “MONSTER” ist only a large, death giant turtle without the shild.

    It´s not a monster, or an alien^^ (but it looked like so, because it´s to decayed)

    The long fingers are normal for turtles and the skull looked very identic with a giantturtle.

    But nice, funny homepage^_^

  22. amanda says:

    i think that this one is from plum island, because they do testing on live stock and this looks like it could be a cow or something like that, but it looks completely different from the other ones

  23. Nicole says:

    i should know that its not a raccon because there was a tree in front of my house with many raccons in it… and i stayed up all night looking at them and my dad trying to get them out of the tree cause everyone was afraid of the animal cause of its rabbies!

  24. Nicole says:

    ok… i really dont think that, that thing is part raccon. and also dont think its a sheep i think its a dog…. but i know that its not a monster. its probably just a lab tested creature. ok now i know that its made of many animals…. the animals could possibly be dog, turtle, a type of a bird, a fat cat, and some sea creature that once lived. thank you and please look into my fun facts!

  25. MB says:

    Do you people really believe this? All this is is fun with animal corpses. Lame.

  26. dude says:

    i think its an evil scintest that make expireance on racoons so they phisacly change and then he just throw them in the oscean

  27. cynie says:

    could be fighting dogs that lost a battle and died and that the people had to get rid of them maybe thats why the skin of the skull is al rapped off…. its just a guess

  28. cynie says:

    Like “lago” says its not a goat if you zoom in you see that its misses its cutting teeth and front teeth so it looks like a goat but look closly and you see the holes of the missing teeth in the jaw its clearly a carnivor could be that people are trowing these animals in the water you know how sick some people are i dont know what is going on there. but it looks like some people trying to be funny or something

    greetz from the netherlands…

  29. Codien says:

    There’s no way that this ‘creature’ in this picture has anything in relation to the first discovery. Look at the creatures head, this one has a long face while the first discovered hasa small head.

    There is of course no coindence that these animal dumpings on beaches are connected. My theory is these animals have been dumped into the water from Pet burial services. You know those people that take your dead pets and cremate or bury the animals.

    Which would make sense why this picture looks like a dog; a german shepard dog.

  30. Kelly says:

    Can you access my e-mail address without me posting it to just anyone and everyone???

  31. Kelly says:

    To who ever is running this site, please contact me so I can mail you my photos of this thing for people to view… I have 4 of them..

  32. Joe mamma says:

    Then again plum islands could be experimenting and the guys could have said they made the monster for publisity…

  33. Joe mamma says:

    Well the first one two guys said they found a dead raccoon, lit it on fire, put in in an inflatable floatie duck toy and pushed it out to sea then two weeks later it showed up… the other thing looks like a goat.

  34. pete says:

    it looks like a fd up bear

  35. Evan says:

    Whats up man i’ve been following this story for about two days now and i think that someones behind this montuak monster thing…people keep on calling it a racoon……UM HELLO its washing up on the shore.. Unless somebody went on a boat with a dead racoon.. and yeah you get the picture.? And the last two dont even look like racoons? So thank you for helping find the truth to this whole thing. and i hope you read this

  36. Smiller says:

    i am more convinced that this is a german shephard dog. the second picture gives a little more detail and i see that the back legs has paws, not huffs. and the size of it looks bigger than a goat.

  37. Dan says:

    Looks like a dog.

  38. Cnidaria says:

    This one looks very staged.

  39. Keith says:

    So why are the police ever called?

  40. Jasper says:

    Just get a fucking autopsy or DNA check of something! Its not a goat look at it’s feet. its not a raccoon cuz of size and dogs aren’t that fat.

  41. joey says:

    it looks like a goat. im not saying that i think its fake but every time you see one the facial skin is gone anybody notice that

  42. Lago says:

    Anyone thinking this is a goat should go to school and sign up for some basic biology lessons as soon as possible…

    It is not an ungulate. It is a carnivore for certain.

    At first inspection, this appears to be, no surprise, another raccoon…

  43. AG says:

    Question. If this is “real” why hasn’t anyone who have “found” these so called monsters turn it in to authorities or to science to find out what this is and claim the discovery? This seems like a fake and that none of the 4 found are real.

    Why would someone want to store it. if you can get there in time to take photo’s, then I would think that someone who would want to research this should also be able to get there in time as well to pick up the “monster”.

  44. edistheman says:

    do a video next time it defiantly will get more attention that way. (but its probably hard to do so one second thought just stick with the pictures)

  45. brianna says:

    to me i don’t think it is a mixed up animal experiment or a raccoon i think the third one is a goat.

  46. Rich Brandon says:

    I think it’s a goat.

  47. josh9123 says:

    I have a feeling that this very picture is a goat or a lamb becayse og the skull the fur and the legs but the first pic ever found realy looked like a montauk monster but this is a goat or lamb

  48. p says:

    its so weird, i got a feeling to look at this site 2day n its right after a new one was found, creepy

  49. Steve says:

    Dang. have the authorities, or any scientific authorities had any contact with you? or anyone who has this beast?

    are they really playing that there interest isn’t piqued?

  50. Kelly says:

    I was there the night they found the monster and I also have very explicit photos of the same “Montauk Monster”… They are VERY REAL and TRUE…. When will the media and government DO something about it and acknowledge what is going on at Plum Island????

Leave a Reply