Comments on: Jenna Hewitt: New Picture Released!

By: James

James — Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:13:26 +0000

wow you all fail..thats obviously a project scientists are working on trying to create a gryphon. you know, the mythical creature or its an area 51 project that is gonna help in warfare to save humans form dying more and let those fight for us. god ur all stupid.

By: Al

Al — Thu, 15 Jul 2010 18:51:17 +0000

Here’s what it’s not: A raccoon, a turtle/tortoise, rodent, a dog, a sheep, or a sloth. I think it’s a… (I can’t believe no one’s guessed this yet) BEAR WITH AN UNUSUALLY LONG TAIL AND FINGERS! According to the flipped over pictures, it had light brown fur when it was alive. perhaps all of it’s thick fur fell off and only a bit of it’s underfur remains. Also, it’s backside is a bit bigger than it’s front, not uncommon in bears. Also, we know that it can’t be a raccoon because it’s legs are too long in proportion to the body, but this looks about right for bears.

By: Donnie Hoyle

Donnie Hoyle — Fri, 25 Jun 2010 04:36:58 +0000

Wow, it’s amazing what you can do with photoshop these days!

By: marcjeremi

marcjeremi — Thu, 08 Apr 2010 02:14:10 +0000

what is wrong with you people its a F&?*&ing turtle with out a shell , people have to stop this none sense , selling turtle shell its not nice i have seen how its done it brutal .
and for you dom doms that think its a montauk monster !!! wow jesus insted start a club for stoping this nonsense of turtle abuse . kids think its funny to snap the off the turtle shell so you dom doms can go around the web posting this ..

By: john o'shea

john o'shea — Sat, 19 Sep 2009 18:50:40 +0000

god damn it its my missus (ex missus) cause she is one ugly son of a bitch these days and im pretty sure id rather wake up with that than her oh no its not her the monster thing doesnt have enough fur on it to be her my bad

By: cajunmom

cajunmom — Mon, 18 May 2009 15:21:29 +0000

I can undrestand how it could be mis-identified as a nutria, but I live on a bayou in southern Louisiana, and there are tons of nutria here. I have problems with them messing up my flower beds. They have big front teeth, like a beaver (to eat roots of trees and other vegetation). These teeth are a very bright orange. (like orange soda). In all of the pics that I’ve seen here, those teeth are not that of a nutria.

By: cc

cc — Mon, 18 May 2009 14:33:41 +0000

People, we really have to be open to the fact that this may be a whole new species of animal that we are just now discovering or possibly one that we thought to be extinct. It clearly resembles a couple of different species; but does not entirely look identicle to any of them! This body shape and size paired with this unusual looking beak is truly curiously amazing; and with the color variation between the first two carcuses, I would definately not think it would be a turtle.

By: Amy

Amy — Mon, 18 May 2009 03:48:12 +0000

That is not a dog or a tutle. Look at the hands/feet. I believe the racoon thing more than anything I have read so far. Take a very close look at the front feet. They are more like tiny hands, like that of a racoon,possum (my spelling is a bit off tonight) I wouldn’t rule out some type of monkey even. I have been around dead animal carcasses alot in my life and I have also raised many wild animals and have seen first hand the decomposing nature of dogs,turtles,racoons,and most any domestic animal you can think of.
In my opinion yes it is similar to that of a racoon corpse. Not knowing how long the animal has been decomposing or if it is in the surf makes it harder to determine what exactly it is.

By: Bingananus

Bingananus — Sun, 17 May 2009 11:51:48 +0000

I bet someone that lives in Asia can tell you if it is a dog or not from the cuisine and other abuses they do to dogs there but everyone turns a blind eye to but if you’re black in the usa you can get lynched for mistreating dogs…sorry im off subject

By: Beachbound

Beachbound — Sun, 17 May 2009 05:59:54 +0000

It’s a poo poo head!