Taxidermist preserves the remains of a Chupacabra-like animal in Texas.

The species of the Montauk Monster is still undetermined because a formal autopsy has never been conducted. Additionally, the individual carcasses discovered have not been preserved. (The Clapsaddle Carcass was taken by authorities, however lab results were never disclosed.)

Many people have expressed their feelings that the police should be called immediately. It’s not always that simple as the individuals who’ve discovered “beastie” are unsure who to call as they think they may be holding an animal of tremendous value.

Recently, in Texas the remains of what appears to be a chupacabra have been found. The unidentified carcass was taken to a local taxidermy school where it was frozen and preserved. The gentleman who found the dead animal was really thinking when he removed it from the ground. What has been determined is the animal was not native to Texas in the area where it was discovered.

What does this mean for the Montauk Monster? Should another carcass be found on the shores of Long Island it should be removed and brought to a taxidermist immediately. That certainly is a feasible way in getting to the bottom of recent discoveries and the mystery behind them.

Below is a clip from CNN indicating the proper procedure for handling unidentified animals. Find out who your local taxidermist is and have their contact information handy should you stumble upon a Montauk Monster!

Tags: , , , , ,

2 Responses to “Taxidermist preserves the remains of a Chupacabra-like animal in Texas.”

  1. Neil Robert says:

    QOUTED
    “This looks to me like a breed of hairless dog. The breed is called Xoloitzcuintle”

    actually a typical Xoloitzcuintle doesnt have fangs like that of the Chupacabra-like animal and probably not like that tails. Well for me its actually like a half dog half kangaroo with mysterious rat-like tails. and it got hoofs too :P

  2. Bee says:

    This looks to me like a breed of hairless dog. The breed is called Xoloitzcuintle, and it’s highly possible that it was someone’s pet which either ran away from home or was abandoned in the area. This carcass looks exactly like a Xoloitzcuintle to me, not a chupacabra in the slightest. If the chupacabra does exist, I don’t know why it would have the same physical structure as a dog; the majority of reports I’ve read about the chupacabra describe it as a bipedal creature, not a quadruped as is seen here. I feel sorry for the poor dog that they killed, but I’m afraid that it’s not a chupacabra.

Leave a Reply